my mistake.' 22 Aug 02:40 'this is from before I played with her' 22 Aug 02:46 'isn't she pretty?' 22 Aug 02:56 'BTW, does the murderer got caught or just disappeared on the internets? Also, please, stop being such colossal retards for 5 minutes and stop talking about the troll. The first one is free as her name is unlikely to be guessed.' 22 Aug 02:33 'wow off to a great start. If you guess all of the names I will show you where I dumped a body in 1999. I also have pictures of them before death when I was able to do so. Some are Polaroids and others were taken with a disposable camera. If you can guess a name of any of these women I will upload their photo. If you can guess a name I will upload a picture. 'I have killed several women for pleasure. So, our search should be focused on missing people from 1998 to posterior years. If that's the case, all the other victims must have been murdered AFTER 1998. so, if he commited a mistake, it was because it was his FIRST TIME KILLING? Was Shauna his first victim? He took a camera with him, so it was planned, but it doesent exclude that this murder might have been the first. Why? Because he learned something i supouse. But on a subsecuent murder, he actually HIDES the body. He kills a woman, and throws the body on the road. The killer said that if somebody guessed right the names of his victims, he would reveal 'where (he) dumped a body in 1999'. In that time, she had been working at a fast-food restaurant in Las Vegas and living on her own. 4 mounths later, she is murdered and her body bumped on the road, in a place between 'downtown and nowhere'. She run away from her home in Norco on Dec. Shauna was killed in 1998, April 24 more presicely. Somebody discovers de ID of one of the girls and the killers shits in his pants and stops playing. 'A guy starts a thread on 4chan, showing us pics of muerdered womans and telling us to play with him. man that first pic is pretty confusing now.' 26 Aug 03:03 one he hates her enough to stick skewers in her head and holes, and the other to pose her for photos with jewellery. could be he sees her in two different ways. could be that he interferes with them without the jewellery. the other corpse, box girl, had no jewellery that was on her that i could see. unless you can figure it really clear without just back and forth dialogue, its better to go forward with the new info, and consider its possible the jewellery was taken. if first pic was her, she would have to be changed into the same clothes she ran away in.anyway. and they left the originals there? ok well what about the other possible process. think about the kind of mind that notices details like that. the jewellery may be lookalikes, but i think theres a higher chance that their originals. its a very elegant pose and he may have chosen it for her photograph. 'the ring on display on the first pic, may explain the hand pose.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |